The Intellectual Crisis of Professional Skepticism: A Sacrifice of Truth

This article explores how professional skeptics, in their critique of paranormal phenomena, have distorted facts due to bias and lack of evidence, sacrificing truth. Using the cases of Martin Gardner and J.B. Rhine as examples, the author reveals that accusations of manipulation and misconduct in parapsychological research often lack credible evidence and even fabricate facts. The article calls for a more rigorous, objective, and scientifically sound approach to skepticism.