SIMD Functions: The Promise and Peril of Compiler Auto-Vectorization

2025-07-05
SIMD Functions: The Promise and Peril of Compiler Auto-Vectorization

This post delves into the intricacies of SIMD functions and their role in compiler auto-vectorization. SIMD functions, capable of processing multiple data points simultaneously, offer significant performance improvements. However, compiler support for SIMD functions is patchy, and the generated vectorized code can be surprisingly inefficient. The article details how to declare and define SIMD functions using OpenMP pragmas and compiler-specific attributes, analyzing the impact of different parameter types (variable, uniform, linear) on vectorization efficiency. It also covers providing custom vectorized implementations using intrinsics, handling function inlining, and navigating compiler quirks. While promising performance gains, practical application of SIMD functions presents considerable challenges.

Read more
Development

LLVM-MCA Performance Analysis: Pitfalls of Vectorization Optimization

2025-06-29
LLVM-MCA Performance Analysis: Pitfalls of Vectorization Optimization

The author encountered a performance degradation issue when vectorizing code using ARM NEON. The initial code used five load instructions (5L), while the optimized version used two loads and three extensions (2L3E) to reduce memory accesses. Surprisingly, the 2L3E version was slower. Using LLVM-MCA for performance analysis revealed that 2L3E caused bottlenecks in CPU execution units, unbalanced resource utilization, and stronger instruction dependencies, leading to performance regression. The 5L version performed better due to its more balanced resource usage and independent load instructions. This case study highlights how seemingly sound optimizations can result in performance degradation if CPU resource contention and instruction dependencies aren't considered; LLVM-MCA proves a valuable tool for analyzing such issues.

Read more
Development

Compiler Optimization's Impact on Memory-Bound Code: -O3 Isn't Always King

2025-06-01
Compiler Optimization's Impact on Memory-Bound Code: -O3 Isn't Always King

Research from Johnny's Software Lab shows that the benefits of compiler optimizations (like GCC's -O3) aren't always dramatic in memory-bound code. They tested two kernels: one with high Instruction Level Parallelism (ILP), the other with low ILP. Results showed a 3x speedup for the high-ILP kernel with -O3. However, for the low-ILP kernel, optimization offered minimal gains because memory access became the bottleneck. This demonstrates that in highly memory-bound scenarios, even with fewer instructions, performance improvements are limited by low ILP, requiring optimization strategies tailored to code characteristics.

Read more

Link-Time Optimization (LTO): The Next Level of Compiler Optimization?

2025-05-21
Link-Time Optimization (LTO): The Next Level of Compiler Optimization?

This article explores Link-Time Optimization (LTO), a technique that enhances program performance by performing optimizations during the linking stage. Traditional compilers optimize within individual files, while LTO allows for more comprehensive cross-file optimizations, such as function inlining and improved code locality. While LTO can yield significant performance improvements (e.g., a 9.2% reduction in runtime and a 20% decrease in binary size in the ProjectX project test), it also requires longer compilation and linking times and more memory. The author compares experiments on ProjectX and ffmpeg to illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of LTO and suggests trying LTO on projects not aggressively optimized for speed, concluding that ultimate performance gains depend on the specific project.

Read more

Avoiding Data Copies: Exploring Efficient Buffer Resizing in C++

2025-04-04
Avoiding Data Copies: Exploring Efficient Buffer Resizing in C++

Johnny's Software Lab explores methods to avoid costly data copying in C++. The article delves into how operating system calls like `mmap` (Linux) and `VirtualAlloc` (Windows) can enable dynamic buffer resizing, thus avoiding data copies. It compares the performance differences between various approaches, including using `mremap`, `xallocx` (jemalloc), and custom memory allocation strategies. Experiments demonstrate that avoiding copies significantly improves performance, but caution is advised regarding cross-platform differences and potential memory fragmentation issues.

Read more
Development