Reinforcement Learning: Powering the Rise of Agentic AI in 2025

2025-06-28
Reinforcement Learning: Powering the Rise of Agentic AI in 2025

Early attempts at AI agents like BabyAGI and AutoGPT in 2023, while initially hyped, faltered due to large language models (LLMs) struggling with multi-step reasoning. However, mid-2024 saw a turnaround. Advances in reinforcement learning enabled a new generation of AI agents capable of consistently completing complex, multi-step tasks, exemplified by code generation tools like Bolt.new and Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Reinforcement learning, through trial-and-error training, overcomes the compounding error problem inherent in imitation learning, allowing models to remain robust even with unseen data. Techniques like OpenAI's RLHF and Anthropic's Constitutional AI automate feedback, further boosting reinforcement learning's efficiency. DeepSeek's R1 model showcased the remarkable potential of models "self-teaching" reasoning through reinforcement learning. In short, advancements in reinforcement learning are the key driver behind the surge in agentic AI in 2025.

Read more
AI

Meta's Llama 3.1 Model Found to Memorize Significant Portions of Copyrighted Books

2025-06-15
Meta's Llama 3.1 Model Found to Memorize Significant Portions of Copyrighted Books

New research reveals Meta's Llama 3.1 70B large language model surprisingly memorized substantial portions of copyrighted books, memorizing 42% of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. This is significantly higher than its predecessor, Llama 1 65B, raising serious copyright concerns. Researchers efficiently assessed the model's 'memorization' by calculating the probability of generating specific text sequences, rather than generating a large volume of text. This finding could significantly impact copyright lawsuits against Meta and might prompt courts to revisit the boundaries of fair use in AI model training. While the model memorized less from obscure books, the excessive memorization of popular books highlights challenges in large language models concerning copyright issues.

Read more
AI

The AI Hype in Science: A Physicist's Disillusionment

2025-05-20
The AI Hype in Science: A Physicist's Disillusionment

Nick McGreivy, a Princeton PhD physicist, shares his experience applying AI to physics research. Initially optimistic about AI's potential to accelerate research, he found AI methods significantly underperformed their advertised capabilities. Many papers exaggerated AI's advantages, with issues like data leakage prevalent. He argues that the rapid rise of AI in science stems more from benefits to scientists (higher salaries, prestige) than genuine improvements to research efficiency. He calls for more rigorous AI evaluation and cautions against optimistic biases in AI research.

Read more

Waymo's Self-Driving Accident Analysis: Are Humans the Real Culprits?

2025-03-26
Waymo's Self-Driving Accident Analysis: Are Humans the Real Culprits?

This article analyzes 38 serious accidents involving Waymo self-driving cars between July 2024 and February 2025. Surprisingly, the vast majority of these accidents were not caused by Waymo vehicles themselves, but rather by other vehicles driving recklessly, such as speeding and running red lights. Waymo's data shows that its self-driving vehicles have a much lower accident rate than human drivers. Even if all accidents were attributed to Waymo, its safety record is still significantly better than human drivers. Compared to human driving, Waymo has made significant progress in reducing accidents, especially those resulting in injuries.

Read more
AI