The Crisis of Academic Conferences: Formalism Stifles Innovation?

In computer science, top academic conferences have become the primary metric for research value, but their increasing bureaucratization and formalism threaten the vitality of academic innovation. The article argues that conferences have devolved into annual 'promotion exams,' with reviews focusing more on formal rules than on the inherent value of research, stifling many promising, innovative works. The author calls for a change in conference review culture, shifting the focus back to academic innovation itself. Recommendations include eliminating unnecessary bureaucratic rules and entrusting decision-making to senior experts in the field to foster academic advancement.