The Relativity of Wrong: Why 'Wrong' Isn't Always Equally Wrong

This essay argues that scientific theories aren't simply 'right' or 'wrong,' but rather exist on a spectrum of accuracy. Using the evolving understanding of Earth's shape as an example—from flat to spherical to oblate spheroid to a slightly pear-shaped model—Asimov demonstrates that scientific progress is a process of refinement, not replacement. Older theories, while incomplete, often contain valuable truths that persist in later, more refined models. The author concludes that celebrating current scientific understanding is justified, even acknowledging its inherent incompleteness.