Can AI Replace Research Scientists? UF Study Says No (Mostly)

A University of Florida study tested generative AI's ability to conduct academic research. While AI excelled in ideation and research design, it struggled significantly with literature review, results analysis, and manuscript production, requiring substantial human oversight. Researchers advocate for high skepticism towards AI outputs, viewing them as requiring human verification and refinement. Published in the Journal of Consumer Psychology, the study prompts reflection on AI's role in research—more assistant than replacement.