Nagel on Moral Judgment and Progress: A Critique

This article examines Thomas Nagel's views on the objectivity of moral judgment and moral progress. Using the anecdote of a WWII French Resistance member interrogating a Nazi collaborator, Nagel illustrates the power of moral intuitions. While acknowledging utilitarian and evolutionary explanations for these intuitions, he argues they reflect underlying moral truths. Nagel distinguishes scientific from moral progress, asserting that accessing moral truths depends on historical developments revealing new moral reasons. He uses examples like individual rights, social equality, sexual morality, and international justice to show moral progress stems from multiple factors, not a single principle. The author ultimately questions Nagel's view, suggesting applying utilitarian principles to all affected individuals is key to moral advancement.