Rust's Type Safety: A Deep Dive via Stock Order Example
2025-05-06
This article compares Rust and C++'s handling of function parameters to illustrate the importance of type safety. Using a simulated stock order function as an example, it shows C++'s struggles in preventing parameter type confusion, highlighting how even with multiple improvements, errors remain possible. Rust, however, leverages its powerful type system and compile-time checks to effortlessly solve these issues. Even when converting user-supplied strings to numerical types, Rust effectively prevents errors, avoiding crashes and incorrect results. The article emphasizes Rust's advantages in ensuring code safety and reliability, showcasing features beyond just memory safety.
Development
Type Safety