Stanford Study: Renewable Energy Outperforms Carbon Capture in Cost-Effectiveness
A Stanford University study reveals that transitioning to 100% wind, solar, geothermal, and hydropower by 2050 would be far more cost-effective than carbon capture technologies for most countries globally. This shift would significantly reduce energy needs and costs, improve air quality, and mitigate climate change. The research compared two extreme scenarios: a complete switch to renewables versus continued fossil fuel reliance with added carbon capture. The study found that transitioning to renewables would prevent millions of illnesses and deaths annually related to air pollution from fossil fuels, making it a superior and more cost-effective solution than carbon capture. The researchers advocate abandoning policies promoting carbon capture, arguing that eliminating combustion is crucial for addressing air pollution and climate change.